Task #128

organize initial 'sounding board' meeting

Added by Sam Boyer over 1 year ago. Updated over 1 year ago.

Status:New Start date:12/28/2011
Priority:High Due date:02/06/2012
Assignee:molly b % Done:

30%

Category:ideation Spent time: -
Target version:0.1.0

Description

Mid-Jan event. Location TBD.
slide deck presentation, followed by a town hall style meeting.

context:
i've been hankering to put together a group of non-technical folks who're very otherwise engaged with the movement that can serve as an advisory group, at for our early stages. feedback at any level would certainly be welcome, but i think the primary value for us would be for dealing with questions such as:

  1. do "physical occupations" - a la liberty plaza - make the most sense as the top-level organizing concept for nodes?
  2. how do we balance allowing for good online 'process' that creates trust and good spaces against creating onerous, laborious process that just gets in the way of getting shit done?

so, higher-level network structure & communications sorts of questions. i'm imagining folks with a more practical organizing orientation here, though that's my bias and i wouldn't impose it on the process.

anyway, i finally got a chance to talk with Max about putting together a group like this, and he's agreed to largely bottom-line the getting together of an initial meeting. the goal there would be for us to make a baseline-setting presentation and start some dialogue, from which folks who're interested can opt in to participate in the advisory group. from there, i'm imagining we'll have an advisory group meeting on a weekly basis, with those folks free to jump in more if they want, but really focus on just making an effective weekly discussion the substance of their contribution.

so, opening this ticket for discussion/tracking progress on getting that meeting together. TBD is an attendee list, a space that can accommodate maybe 30 people + a projector, and (of course) us getting a clear presentation together. we were thinking mid-January for the meeting, so no huge rush.

let's do this one right, folks :)


Related issues

related to Federated General Assembly - Task #124: Create FGA project description In Progress 12/21/2011
blocked by Federated General Assembly - Task #132: Create Visual Slide deck that provides an introduction to... In Progress 01/11/2012

History

Updated by Sam Boyer over 1 year ago

  • Assignee set to Max Berger

assigning to Max now that he's got his account set up

Updated by Sam Boyer over 1 year ago

here's some 'ask' wordage:

=====

We're looking to create an advisory group to help us grapple with the challenge of making FGA truly "reflect the Occupy movement brick and mortar." This will work best if you've got other ongoing work with Occupy informing your experience, and are concerned with ongoing interocc communication and challenges. Our kickoff meeting will be a context-setting presentation to get everyone on the same page, followed by discussion. Folks can opt in or out of ongoing participation at that point. We'll aim for a weekly-ish meeting of the advisory group to discuss, debate, and generally work to keep FGA in line with the broad direction & structure of the movement. Your insight during those meetings is the basic ask, though you'll be welcome to participate more if you want.

=====

Updated by Sam Boyer over 1 year ago

one person to add to the list - desmond ambrose. he reached out to me a while ago on nycga.net, and i spoke with him on the phone about it all.

Updated by Andrew Mallis over 1 year ago

An advisory group sounds a lot like an advisory board – a typical entity in these kinds of large projects.

I think what we're instead looking for here is a forum in which to engage the types of people we want to hear from – a kind of town hall. We can build a group (a list), but how to we engage?

Are we talking town hall meetings, inter-occupy calls, online forums?
Perhaps a weekly meeting in a public place, i.e. 60 Wall Street? No decisions, just soapboxing.

Thinking about the issue in terms of forums instead of membership frames our priorities more clearly, I think.

It is a really smart idea to regularly test our assumptions.

Updated by molly b over 1 year ago

Also, we should consider changing the title to 'Sounding Board' per discussions yesterday. I also think it would be helpful to include members of allied social movements as well for a varied diverse group of voices.

Updated by Andrew Mallis over 1 year ago

  • Subject changed from organize initial 'advisory group' meeting to organize initial 'sounding board' meeting

Updated by Andrew Mallis over 1 year ago

  • Due date changed from 01/14/2012 to 02/06/2012
  • Target version set to 0.1.0
  • % Done changed from 0 to 30

An entry has been added to the Teams wiki page.

Timeframe looks like we are now aiming for Feb 6.

Updates?

Updated by Sam Boyer over 1 year ago

  • Assignee changed from Max Berger to molly b

yes, we're shooting for feb 6, hopefully 6-9pm at rayogram. molly is confirming that.

i'm also reassigning this to her - hopefully max can show up as an individual participant, but might be better if he hands that list of contacts over to molly and she engages them. (i'm following up with him to coordinate that handoff)

Also available in: Atom PDF